Two stories
Or: How I learned to stop worrying and write about business, already*
Some time ago, on a cold night after work, I stopped in at Chipotle for dinner on my way home. Columbia had just opened its first Chipotle, and it’s located in Forest Acres, an upscale neighborhood with a large commercial and residential footprint, not to mention a major Army base. So even though the lunch crowd is more formidable, by the time I arrived, the dinner rush was in full swing. The night was abnormally cold, and soldiers, businessmen, soccer moms and college students did their best to crowd into the restaurant to stay warm while they waited to order.
In front of me in line was a couple that did not look like they belonged. An older couple, they looked a little out of their element as they stared up at the menu trying to decide what to order. Chipotle’s menu appears simple at first glance, but the ability to create your own burrito right there, on the spot, in front of everyone, can be a little intimidating. The austere, almost industrial concrete floors, metal counter and table tops, and abstract decorations probably wouldn’t help.
The couple made their way through the line, asking a lot of questions and carefully selecting their ingredients. “What’s barbacoa?” “Honey, do you think I’d like the carnitas?” “What did you say was in this salsa?” They reached the end of the line and the elderly man reached for his wallet, he and his looking relieved.
The cashier, who was older than most of the people working behind the counter and I inferred was the owner or at least a general manager, had a friendly look, and asked, with a smile, “would you like chips and salsa with that?” The wife looked at her husband; the husband, back at his wife. They weren’t expecting this. The looks of relief faded, as they wondered to themselves and between each other whether they’d want the chips.
The manager, sensing this moment, hurriedly interrupted: “You know what? It’s your first time here. The chips are on the house.” And he grabbed a bag of chips, a container of salsa, and added it to their tray. The couple looked surprised for a moment, then both smiled, and thanked him as they paid and sat down to enjoy their burritos.
A different night not so long ago, I arrived home from work and checked my mail before heading inside. Among the junk mail, I found a new Netflix movie, and after walking inside and eating dinner, I opened the trademark red envelope and removed the disc from its sleeve.
Like most movies that come from Netflix, especially Blu-rays, the disc art wasn’t colorful and attractive. Instead, it was subdued and grey, with the movie logo in white across one hemisphere, and in the other one, little swatch on the bottom with the word “RENTAL” inside.
Usually, the fact that a disc is a rental disc means that the disc is coded onto the disc in such a way that most Blu-ray players are unable to skip the previews or advertisements; your only option, if you’re (for some reason) not interested in seeing 30 minutes of previews for movies that came out 6 months ago, is using the fast forward option, which you have to restart when the track changes. This is annoying, but honestly, I’ve sort of gotten used to it.
But I was pleasantly surprised that this movie, for whatever reason, let me skip right through the ads at the beginning to the main menu and then the movie with no further interruptions (sometimes they getcha’ with previews before the movie). I watched and enjoyed the movie, an above-average comedy.
When the movie was over, I decided to see if there was a blooper reel, which is usually my favorite special feature of any comedy. Happily, I found one, and clicked it to start. And that’s when I got a message saying: “We reserve special features for customers who buy the movie.” Annoyed, I got the movie out of my Blu-ray player, and returned it to its sleeve and envelope to mail back.
It took me a while to realize what I like about businesses like Chipotle, Netflix, Five Guys, and even sometimes Apple. Companies like these have great reputations with customers because customers feel taken care of, the brand feels like a friend, and no matter the actual profits the company is reeling in (have you seen Apple’s stock price lately?), customers feel like “with this company, it’s about more than just the money.” This seems a little naïve to me: I don’t think any business on earth values anything more than money, it’s like saying some fish value water less than others. But it is true that it seems like some companies put more relative weight on the other issues.
Every business has “good” customers and “bad” customers. No business can predict, with 100% accuracy, whether a customer will prove to be a good customer or a bad customer. Thus, as a business, you have two choices of how to treat your customers:
- Option 1: Assume most of your customers are going to be good customers. Realize that new customers are more likely to become good customers if their first (few) experiences are good. Understand that this won’t always work: that some new customers, despite your best efforts, won’t become good customers. Further understand that if this happens more often than not, the problem is with you, the businessowner, not the customer. Act by figuring out what you can do to make a new customer’s experience a good one, and a returning customer’s experience just as good every time they come back.
- Option 2: Assume most of your customers are one-time customers. Further assume that you have very few opportunities to get as much value as you can out of a customer, because most of your customers are coming to you with a situational need. Act by figuring out what your customers tend to need, and extract as much value as you can out of those needs.
From the first story, Chipotle is clearly taking Option 1. But the Blu-ray manufacturer (Universal), is taking Option 2: they’re assuming that most rental customers won’t ever buy the movie unless they’re “forced” to (for reasons like: needing the movie the day it comes out, as opposed to 28 days after Blu-ray release; wanting to see the special features; wanting to be able to skip advertisements and previews).
It’s true that in the short term, Option 2 is more profitable. But in this age of social networking and endorsement, good customer experiences are more important than ever, and the short term success of Option 2 is growing shorter than ever. And here’s the thing about Option 2: nobody likes you. No one’s on the street singing Wal-mart’s praises, no one’s talking about what a great burger they got from McDonald’s, and no one is talking about what a great experience they had pumping gas at BP. It’s Option 1 that makes you relevant, even cool, among today’s society.
Take Louis CK: last month, he released a comedy special. However, rather than just a standard DVD release, Louis decided to release the video online, DRM-free, for $5 (about $10 less than the average new DVD). When you bought the movie, you got three separate downloads, but once you paid your money and got your video, you were basically on the honor system: there was nothing to stop you from putting it in your Dropbox and sharing it to the world.
Louis’s rationale was that DRM, while it may prevent some theft, is easily circumvented (if you’re motivated to do so), and in most cases just annoys people who bought it legally: DRM-ed video files can’t go on every device, some of them are associated with online accounts with passwords, etc. So he took the risk of losing some money short term in the interest of providing a good customer experience. How’d it work? He made a million dollars in twelve days. He had a lot of factors working in his favor, like the fact that he was already well-known and trusted, but still, he called the experiment a success.
But unlike much of the coverage said about it, Louis CK’s experiment wasn’t anything new: companies like Chipotle, Five Guys, and Netflix have been treating their customers like this for years. Ever get a Netflix disc with a scratch that doesn’t let you watch the movie? You don’t fill out a long form, mail in the broken disk, wait for approval, and then, finally get a new disc; you click a button and a a new disc is shipped immediately, with Netflix assuming that you’re a good customer and aren’t trying to take advantage. I imagine there’s some cutoff where Netflix will stop being so trusting, but they’re willing to risk a few Blu-ray discs if the reward is the customer being happy with their service.
And I think this is where we are in the 21st century. Businesses can’t hide behind brick and mortar or geographical boundaries; if they try to do so, they’ll be wiped out by a business who didn’t. So Universal (and other similar companies, I’m looking at you big media): treat your customers like you want them to be your customers again. Make their experience great, and expect that if you succeed in doing that, their repeated business will make up for your earlier slimmer profits.
* Working subtitle for this post: “Send me a bad Blu-ray disc, will you? TAKE THAT, UNIVERSAL!”
† Both stories are completely true (as in I witnessed them happen), and they happened about a year apart.
** My degree is in computer science, not business. Hopefully that doesn’t invalidate my entire opinion (if it does, I totally get that), but if you go out and start a business based on this advice and it fails, you can’t hold me liable. But, you know, good luck!
Developing asychronously
Why it works for Github, but maybe not for the rest of us
These days, it’s not hard to find a Silicon Valley startup that claims, not so modestly, that it’s changing the world. And while it’s true that some startups are doing just that, the not-well-kept secret is that most of them aren’t doing anything productive, much less profitable, but still somehow find ways to get funding. But one startup, Github, is unique: not only is it changing the world, but it’s changing the way startups change the world. Github’s about page claims it hosts over two million repositories, which include the likes of the Facebook SDKs, the popular JavaScript framework jQuery, and the open-source release of Doom 3. It was even the primary home to arguably the most important open-source project ever, the Linux kernel, when its usual home was compromised earlier this summer.
And while Github is making a huge difference in how people write, store and track their source code, it’s also starting to affect how people develop software. This is an important distinction, and failing to optimize the processes and philosophies that you and your team take while developing software can lead to productivity losses just as severe as bad developers or bad bugs.
We recently finished up the latest major version of a project at work, a web application that allows our clients to view Facebook Page analytics that we generate and empower them to craft their future social media strategy. The project has seen a couple iterations, but for this one, in an effort to make the whole thing simpler, we reworked most of it from the ground up, including a brand new user interface.
But while CSS is a very powerful tool, this web app was going to require a lot of it, using features from every version of CSS. And while “graceful degradation” was our methodology to some degree, the last version of this product didn’t support any browser except Chrome (because of time constraints) and it was made clear that this time, we would need to support all major browsers. This would mean hundreds of rules, nested rules, exceptions to rules, and fixes for The Browser That Shall Not Be Named.
So in an effort to simplify our CSS develop/test/deploy cycle, we decided to employ LESS, an extended CSS with support for nesting, variables, imports, and expressions.
Change from the change you can believe in
An overview of the 2012 Republican Presidential candidates
The 2012 Republican presidential race started, for all intents and purposes, on November 5, 2008, the day after Barack Obama was elected. Since then, a lot of partisan bickering, speculation and rumor-mongering, and nearly three years later, we have what looks to be the final Republican field before primary season begins. The field isn’t demographically diverse: only Michelle Bachmann and Herman Cain break the trend of white males. But the diverse backgrounds, ideas and viewpoints among the candidates leave something for just about everyone; everyone, that is, who doesn’t plan on voting for President Obama. My overview of the candidates, after the break.
Nobody expected the Cleveland Indians to do much in 2011. Before the beginning of the season, I think most Indians fans were cautiously optimistic about the offense, assuming the offense stayed healthy, Travis Hafner produced more, Grady Sizemore came back at 100% from his microfracture, and a hitting fairy paid a visit to Matt LaPorta (or really, any right-handed batter in the Indians organization). I think Indians fans were cautiously optimistic about the bullpen, assuming everyone stayed healthy, Chris Perez continued his strong showing as Indians closer, and a couple of veterans like Joe Smith were able to guide the young Indians ‘pen. But I think Indians fans were decidedly lukewarm about the Indians starting pitching, even if everyone stayed healthy, Fausto Carmona kept his mind, and Justin Masterson grew some hair.
In short, there were a lot of things that could have gone wrong. As Indians fans, we’re accustomed to everything that can go wrong going wrong, so no one predicted the Indians riding a 9-game winning streak and a 14-game home winning streak to a 30-15 start. No one predicted them hanging on to first place for much of the summer, and then staying competitive until early September. The Indians fell short of the postseason this year, but there’s no doubt there was tremendous improvement. My year-end grades for the Indians, plus playoff predictions, after the break.
Last weekend, I flew up to Minneapolis, Minnesota to meet up with two college roommates and friends and take in some baseball. As it happened, the Indians were in town, so it turned into an opportunity for me to see them in person for the only time this year. As it further happened, when we planned the trip and bought the tickets in July, Jim Thome was playing for the Twins, but by the time we arrived in Minneapolis on September 16, he was a Cleveland Indian again. This was also the first time I’ve visited a stadium that wasn’t Progressive Field more than once, so I was able to get a great look at Target Field, the newest stadium in baseball until next April. My review of Target Field, after the break.
Three thousand, nine hundred eighty-one days ago, on October 17, 2000, a small water craft slammed into the side of the USS Cole, killing seventeen American sailors and injuring thirty-nine. While Americans mourned the loss of their sailors, there’s no way we knew – there’s no way we could have known – that the attack on the Cole was an ominous harbinger of a far more deadly attack to come. Nearly eleven months later, on September 11, 2001, four airliners crashed into the World Trade Center in New York, the Pentagon in Washington, DC, and a remote field in Shanksville, PA. Ten years later, as the country continues the long healing process, seems an appropriate time to reflect. I’m not really sure why I’m writing this: around this time last year I decided I’d try to write it, but I’m not sure anyone else but me will find it useful. Maybe it’ll offer closure. Or maybe it’s so I don’t forget.
Last night, Jim Thome clubbed his 600th career home run into the bullpen at Comerica Park. As he rounded first base, the man who has almost 100 more home runs with the Indians than any other Indian, the man who is tied for the all-time lead in walk off home runs, the owner of the 17th- and 34th-best career OPS and OBP, respectively, and the man with the eighth most home runs in baseball history, Jim Thome simply pumped his fist in the air and ran around the bases. As he got to home plate, it was tough to tell who was happier: his teammates or his family. Thome smiled too, but it was one of his trademark, humble smiles that really embodied his chase towards 600 home runs: just a great guy who happened to be a great hitter that stuck around for a while.

New look, same brilliant writing! ... Oh, don't make that face. It's not like you were paying for it.
Welcome to the new Cleveland, Curveballs and Common Sense, codenamed “The Experiment”! Go ahead and take a look around, then come on back and I’ll show you around.
Last year, around this time, I started thinking about redesigning my blog. I was working on implementing a WordPress theme from scratch at work; with Stephen Stanton (and his boss Josh Laney) providing the graphics and creative vision, all I had to do was write the code that powered a new WordPress site for our Chasing Trophy Whitetails brand. On my end, there were some neat technical things with the theme like an HTML5 image gallery and automatic generation of OpenGraph tags. It seemed pretty fun and pretty easy at the time, and so I quickly became eager to write a theme for my own blog and transfer some of that new knowledge over.
But it’s not even close to that easy: it takes skill and talent to create and execute a WordPress theme design, and so I flustered for almost a year, coming up with various ideas but nothing good enough to make me want to switch.
If you look on my company’s team page, you’ll find my picture captioned “Overrater”. I take this caption somewhat in stride, because being involved in developing many of the analytic algorithms at our office means that I’m spending a lot of my days “rating” client’s Facebook Pages and presences. The reason the caption is there though, is that I have a strong tendency to not be impressed with things most people seem to like (“Shark Week”, “Avatar”, “Top Gun”, college football, to name a few) and call them overrated.
Which brings me to Google’s new, much touted social network called, simply: Google Plus. Google+ isn’t Google’s first entry into the social arena, but it’s their newest and inarguably their strongest. And while Google enjoyed excellent early reviews as well as an early influx of 10 million enthusiastic users, my impressions of Google+ are much less enthusiastic. My initial impressions of what’s wrong with Google+, after the break.







