Change from the change you can believe in

An overview of the 2012 Republican Presidential candidates

The 2012 Republican presidential race started, for all intents and purposes, on November 5, 2008, the day after Barack Obama was elected. Since then, a lot of partisan bickering, speculation and rumor-mongering, and nearly three years later, we have what looks to be the final Republican field before primary season begins. The field isn’t demographically diverse: only Michelle Bachmann and Herman Cain break the trend of white males. But the diverse backgrounds, ideas and viewpoints among the candidates leave something for just about everyone; everyone, that is, who doesn’t plan on voting for President Obama. My overview of the candidates, after the break.

Some Analytics Results

A few weeks ago I installed Google Analytics on my blog (actually, I remember when that was, it was actually about 3 weeks ago exactly because it was a Sunday night which I couldn’t fall asleep. Fingers crossed that we don’t have that problem tonight.) Anyway, I’ve referenced it a few times, and talked about it a bit but most of you have never really seen what I get to see often (I say “get” to see because data like this fascinates me), so I thought I’d do a little post with some non-personal information on the visitors this blog has seen thus far.

First, a world map view:


It may be a bit hard to see because of the size, but the United States is dark green, and the countries of Spain (hello, Taylor!), Germany and Australia are light green, meaning my blog is slowly embracing globalization and is being read by others in different countries. Next, let’s zoom in on the US Map:


This one’s a bit more interesting. Count up the green states and you’ll see that I’m reaching 13 states, with very frequent visitors from Ohio, visitors with some frequency from New York (and not just Rochester, surprisingly enough) and some rare visits from Washington, D.C., Idaho and others. And finally, last but not least, a distribution across Ohio:


Keep in mind that for whatever reason, Analytics renders Ohio a bit wrong and so a lot of those cities in northeast Ohio should be much farther north (the big dot, for example, is supposed to be Cleveland). But while northeast Ohio is the clear frontrunner, there are other cities making a Ron Paul-like push for the top.

Anyway, just some interesting statistics thus far about who’s visiting me and from where. I’ll post more meaningful stuff tomorrow between classes. Until then, stay warm, stay focused, and go hard or go home.

And then there were five (or six…)

So we’re down to Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in the Democratic party, versus John McCain, Mitt Romney, and Mike Huckabee in the Republican party (I guess we can count Ron Paul if you really want). I’ve already stated who I would vote for in the primaries, and last night’s debate really showcased Huckabee’s fantastic oratory skills. He didn’t get a lot of facetime, (why? Huckabee is clearly still in this race, but CNN has already chosen its favorites and didn’t give Ron Paul or Huckabee much time to speak at all) but the little facetime he got I thought he used very effectively. But that’s the short version, here’s the long version of how they all did last night:

  1. Mitt Romney: He got the most speaking time of any of the four candidates but didn’t really say very much. Whether he was bickering with McCain about word choice used in early April or trying to state that he’s definitely not pro-choice, Romney did nothing to make me think he’s less of a slimeball than I think. Also, when McCain is talking, SHUT UP. Grade: C+
  2. John McCain: McCain’s got the momentum, the lead, the support of Giuliani, the Governator, and, as Romney pointed out, the liberal New York Times. So what did he do? He spent the evening attacking Romney for the stupidest little things. He came across as petty and childish. His voice didn’t show much passion (it never really has) but instead talking to the voters as equals he was talking above them, as if he knows what he’s doing and no one is gonna’ change his mind. And also, when Romney is talking, SHUT UP. Grade: D
  3. Ron Paul: It’s too bad Ron Paul doesn’t have very much support, because the fact that he’s even in the race keeps the other candidates honest. There were a couple times where he kind of came in after a Romney/McCain exchange and said, “isn’t this a little ridiculous?” I don’t agree with a lot of his policies, but the guy has ideas. His problem is that no one seems to listen. Grade: B+
  4. Mike Huckabee: Huckabee’s performance last night was outstanding. His monologue comparing a governor to a president was outstanding and he did an outstanding job being humble and, to quote his campaign saying, like the guy you work with. The moderator asked him at one point “Rush Limbaugh has said you will destroy the Republican party if nominated”, but I liked his response: “I wish Rush loved me as much as I love Rush. He’s a great voice for the conservatives of this country, but he’s capable of error, and this is one of those times.” The one negative of his performance last night was that you could clearly see he was frustrated with how little time he was getting, as he prodded the moderator to give him more time and allow him to chime in occasionally. Grade: A-

Tonight it’ll be one-on-one, Hillary versus Barack. Should be pretty interesting to watch the fur fly.

I’ve kind of started thinking about how I will vote this fall depending on who is nominated, and I think the results may surprise you. I’ve arranged them into a matrix, Democrats along the top, Republicans along the bottom. Each cell represents who I would vote for if that column ran against that row.

Clinton Obama
Huckabee Huckabee Huckabee
McCain McCain Obama
Paul Paul Obama
Romney Romney Obama

Kind of surprising to those who know me, but there you have it.